How to consider engineered nanomaterials in major accident regulations?

Bernd Nowack,Harald F Krug,Nicole C Mueller,Peter Wick

doi:10.1186/2190-4715-26-2

Abstract

Major accident regulations aim at protecting the population and the environment from possible accidental releases of chemicals. To achieve this goal, the regulations need to be reassessed in light of the development of new technologies. A currently rapidly growing new technology is nanotechnology, and engineered nanomaterials (ENM) are already produced and used in commercial products. The aim of this work was therefore to evaluate the current knowledge on human and ecotoxicology of ENM and their release and behavior in the environment in the context of major accident prevention. Nano-specific release paths are not to be expected. The established safety standards in the chemical industry are also applicable to ENM, especially the separate storage of flammable solvents and detention reservoirs. The potential of a release to the environment of ENM in powder form is larger than for suspensions; however, it can be minimized by safety measures established for conventional dusts. The considered human toxicology studies show that to date not conclusive enough answers regarding the toxicity of ENM can be made. The effects are dependent not only on the material itself but more on the functionalization, surface reactivity, size, and form. The acute ecotoxicity of ENM seems to be similar to the one of the corresponding microparticles (TiO2) or the respective dissolved ions (Ag, Zn) with the exception of photocatalytically active nano-TiO2, which has an increased toxicity. In order to guarantee that all ENM are included in the existing major accident regulations, different classification options are possible and the advantages and disadvantages are discussed. An important step will be the compulsory inclusion of nano-specific data in the Material Safety Data Sheets that serve as the basic medium to transfer information from the manufacturer to downstream users and authorities. We also call for a regular monitoring of the production and uses for ‘high production volume ENM’ that could have the largest implications for major accident regulations.

Highlights

The major accident prevention regulations have the goal to protect the general population and the environment from severe damage due to accidents
There is currently no nano-specific obligation to label, we propose that the containers for transport of engineered nanomaterials (ENM) should be labeled as a hazardous material and that containers of the highest safety standards be used
For carbon nanotube (CNT) and all ENM for which their conventional counterpart is not on the list, we suggest that a casespecific classification has to be performed based on the criteria of the regulation [1]

Summary

Introduction

The major accident prevention regulations have the goal to protect the general population and the environment from severe damage due to accidents. Not have other information than those given in the MSDS, because these contain no nano-specific descriptions These companies are likely to store only small amounts of ENM on their site - due to the high reactivity of the materials and the normally low concentrations used in final products - the relevance for major accidents is seldom given. According to the guidelines of the Major Accident Ordinance [80], currently, the following threshold values are valid for potentially nano-scaled compounds: 2,000 kg: ZnO, AgNO3 No threshold: TiO2, SiO2 Not on the list: CNT, CeO2, carbon black, CaCO3, metallic silver Case-specific evaluation needed: iron oxides, pigments. Option 2 allows a differentiated regulation of all ENM, under the precondition that a clear definition for ENM and the duty for declaration in the MSDS exists

Conclusions

53. NanoTrust: Dossier No10

80. BAFU BfU