Abstract

The voluntary shift of responsibility from the producer to the consumer is one feature of self-design activities. Past research emphasizes the economic gains of such customer co-creation. However, the psychological mechanism underlying customer co-creation behavior is still not fully understood. Notably, the goal-driven self-congruence nature of customer co-creation is mostly ignored in the co-creation literature. The objective of this research is to firstly develop a conceptual understanding of how co-creation literature can be related to the self-congruence theory. Furthermore, this study also extends the original self-congruence theory by arguing the differential role of actual and ideal self-congruence on the relationship between self-congruence and customers’ willingness to participate in the co-creation process. Two laboratory experiments were conducted to examine whether self-congruence plays a prominent role in motivating customers to participate in the self-design process. Specifically, both the actual self-congruence and ideal self-congruence are positively related to customers’ willingness to participate in the self-design process is hypothesized. Moreover, it is expected that product styles and different consumption situations may strengthen the relationship between actual/ideal self-congruence and customers’ willingness to participate in the self-design process. Theoretical and practical implications are also discussed.

Highlights

  • Previous research has defined customer co-creation as “the joint creation of value by the company and the customer; allowing the customer to co-construct the service experience to suit their context” (Prahalad and Ramaswamy, 2004, p. 8)

  • Value creation entails a process that increases and applies the customer’s knowledge and skills to convert the potential value into real value, while co-creation emphasizes the role of the customer evolved from self-service, through the firm-scripted staging of customer experiences, to co-designing and co-production of Better Motivate Customers to Participate service (Grönroos and Voima, 2013; Prahalad and Ramaswamy, 2004; Vargo and Lusch, 2004

  • By employing self-congruence theory, we firstly examined the important role played by self-congruence in the customer co-creation field, which extends the co-creation literature by exploring another important psychological mechanism to understand the motivation of customer co-creation behavior

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Previous research has defined customer co-creation as “the joint creation of value by the company and the customer; allowing the customer to co-construct the service experience to suit their context” (Prahalad and Ramaswamy, 2004, p. 8). Better Motivate Customers to Participate service (Grönroos and Voima, 2013; Prahalad and Ramaswamy, 2004; Vargo and Lusch, 2004). Previous literature has suggested that self-congruence can enhance affective, attitudinal, and behavioral consumer responses to the brand and outcome (Aaker, 1999) Based on this perspective, this study examines the role self-congruence plays in motivating customers to participate in the self-design process. This study explores the consumption situation and product styles as moderators of the relationship between (actual and ideal) self-congruence and willingness of customer participation in the self-design process. The conclusion section summarizes our major expected findings, contributions, and limitations of this study

LITERATURE REVIEW AND THEORETICAL BACKGROUND
GENERAL DISCUSSION
Limitations and Future
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call