How to better help cancer patients face their coming death?

Abstract

e21505 Background: According to literature and medical experience, the doctor-patient relationship becomes strained when oncologists tell their patients that they have no more curative treatments to offer them. Patients often resist when they are told that it is in their best interest to meet with the palliative teams. Little is known about how to meet patients’ expectations at this advanced stage. Methods: We conducted a multicenter qualitative research in an oncology department, a hospital at home service and in an inpatient hospice care center. We met 47 patients (M = 21, F = 27, mean age = 65 yrs, mean disease duration = 5 yrs) for in-depth face to face interviews performed by a multi-disciplinary ethics team. Interviews were carried out between 1 and 3 months before death. Results: Qualitative analysis revealed 4 main results. 1/ For respondents, palliative care introduction meant impending death. 2/ Palliative care introduction meant loss of hope. Without hope, the cancer trajectory is impossible to sustain, they said. 3/ Hope was intricately interwoven with the request for more chemotherapy, even if doctors had clearly refused to provide it. 4/ The oncologist remained the referent physician, even for patients in hospice care. Patients for which the mean duration between cancer diagnosis and interview was 5 years or more, were more willing to talk about death and better accepted palliative care than patients for which the mean duration of cancer was inferior to 3 yrs. For patients with fast progressing cancer (n = 11), 10 were not willing to talk about death and 7 strongly resisted palliative care introduction. There was no difference between patients according to age, sex, type of cancer or center of inclusion. Conclusions: In the terminal phase of cancer, patients are unwilling to talk about death and are reluctant to meet with palliative care teams. Short disease duration strongly reinforces this attitude. If patients resist discussions about their impending death, should physicians continue to consider it good practice to introduce such discussions? Is it beneficent for patients?