How to be a Good Reviewer? A Competency Framework for Reviewer Development

Abstract

The act of reviewing is the backbone of the academic enterprise, as it ensures high-quality outputs. A number of scholars in the early stages of their academic career find themselves in reviewer positions, though it may not always be clear what they need to do or not do when reviewing. With little formal training and the pressures of completing multiple reviews in a timely manner, most scholars learn how to review through a process of trial and error. There is also a need to invest effort in developing the competencies required to be a responsible reviewer. This panel symposium session provides participants with knowledge of the key competencies required in reviewing. These competencies are useful for all types of reviewing of academic research, including both quantitative and qualitative methodologies. We invite expert reviewers and journal editors to serve as panelists and discuss (1) what it means to be a good reviewer in relation to these competencies; (2) practical and ethical challenges of reviewing; and (3) tips to handle tricky situations that present ethical and/or pragmatic constraints when serving as a reviewer. Following the panel discussion, the audience will engage in a series of interactive, hands-on exercises where hypothetical scenarios highlighting prevalent and controversial problems in reviewing practices will be presented in a smaller group to facilitate further discussion and learning. Lessons from these discussions will be shared with the larger group along with critical reflections and practical recommendations (Do’s and Don’ts) on how to conduct an effective and ethical review.