How three rocky shore snails coexist on a limited food resource

Abstract

SummaryCompetition theory poses a major problem when several species coexist on what appears to be one resource. Three Thais species living on the Pacific Northwest Coast provide an example: at many sites, all three depend primarily on one barnacle species. Growth rates of three species were measured for 3 years and these provide an indirect means to assess how these snails use their common food resource. Major temporal differences were observed:T. lamellosa grew 0–1 mm/mo during the spring and 2–3 mm/mo during the summer, while T. emarginata and T. canaliculata grew 2–3 mm/mo during the spring and 0–1 mm/mo during the summer. However, all species are opportunists when food is available, and seasonal and interspecific differences disappeared when all three species were kept well fed together in the laboratory. Therefore, temporal differences arise from spatial segregation rather than from intrinsic differences in activity, and must arise because barnacle abundance patterns differe consistently from one area of the shore to another. Species‐specific activity patterns lead each species to a food intake that is independent of the food supply on the shore as a whole and is also independent of food intake by the other two species. Where two snail species depend upon a single food species, their use of the food supply appears to make it function as two different resources. This resource use is possible because prey quality is markedly dependent on shore level.