Abstract

Pupillometry have recently added valuable insights about the cognitive and possible neurobiological processes underlying episodic memory. Most of the studies, however, investigated recognition memory, which only partially relies on cue-driven recollection, the hallmark feature of episodic memory. Here we measured pupil size during a paired associate learning task, where participants encoded word-pairs, and after a short delay they took part in a cued recall. Importantly, we manipulated the size of the learning set: participants either learnt two, four or eight word-pairs in a row. As expected, increasing set size resulted in larger forgetting, assumingly as a consequence of weaker memory strength for the word-pairs. Our results show an important difference between pupil size changes observed during encoding and retrieval. During retrieval, the pupil instantly begun to dilate, as a sign of increased processing load accompanying the retrieval of the target memory. Importantly, large set size was also associated with larger pupil dilation during retrieval. This supports the notion that pupil dilation can be regarded as a marker of memory strength. In contrast, during encoding, pupil dilation decreased with increasing amount of encoded information, which might be due to the overuse of attentional resources. Furthermore, we also found that serial position during encoding modulated subsequent memory effects: for the first three serial positions, successful recall was predicted by larger pupil dilation during encoding, whereas such subsequent memory effect was absent for later serial positions. These results suggest that the amount of information independently modulates pupil dilation during encoding and retrieval, and support the assumption that pupillometric investigation of paired associate learning could be an informative way to investigate the cognitive and neurobiological processes of episodic memory.

Highlights

  • Since the pioneering work of Hess [1] and Kahneman and Beatty [2], there is a growing amount of evidence suggesting that the size of the pupil tends to change as a consequence of information processing [3,4]

  • We examined whether pupil dilation linked to subsequent memory is affected by serial position during encoding

  • As we found that a decrease in late pupil response is evident after the third serial position, we investigated subsequent memory separately for items encoded on the first three serial positions, and for items encoded on later serial positions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Since the pioneering work of Hess [1] and Kahneman and Beatty [2], there is a growing amount of evidence suggesting that the size of the pupil tends to change as a consequence of information processing [3,4]. The diversity of the results might be explained by the fact that pupil size is correlated with the activity of the locus coeruleus (LC) [11,12], a small brain stem nucleus, from which the majority of cortical noradrenergic (NA) projections originate. This so called LC/NA system is suggested to coordinate task-relevant cortical networks, and has an extensive influence on cortical information processing [13,14]. Different parts of the experiences are bound together and stored as an episodic memory trace, and this trace can be recalled when an appropriate retrieval cue activates that past memory [15,16,17,18]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call