Abstract
EPA's forecast is built on a foundation of five optimistic assumptions. More balanced assumptions would have predicted greater power generation generally and a much heavier reliance on combined cycle. And it would have called for states and the industry to substantially upgrade the nation's gas infrastructure. The rule may still be cost-beneficial, even after EPA improves its impact forecast, but a credible forecast would better prepare the country for the challenges ahead.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
