Abstract

Consumers across the globe tend to store their small electronic devices when they reach their end of life instead of disposing of them. This is a problem because if end-of-life devices are not recovered from consumers’ homes, the devices cannot be re-used or recycled, leading to increased production. We study what motivates consumers to store their end-of-life devices by looking at how storage creates consumer value. Applying a practice-based understanding of value, we find that storage is a social practice that generates value by protecting consumers from four different kinds of risk: practical risks, existential risks, environmental risks, and moral risks. Storage gives consumers a sense of security in their everyday lives and thus generates what we call ‘security value’. This notion implies that even though end-of-life devices sit idle in consumers’ homes, their value generating capacity remains active. The findings have implications for the role of consumers in reverse logistics strategies for sustainable systems.

Highlights

  • Several studies have documented that consumers across the globe tend to store their small electronic devices when they reach their end of life instead of disposing of them [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]

  • We address how storage transforms end-of-life electronics into valuable possessions

  • We find that this transformation happens because storage serves as a practice of managing four types of risk that consumers experience in their lives: practical risks, existential risks, environmental risks, and moral risk

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Several studies have documented that consumers across the globe tend to store their small electronic devices when they reach their end of life instead of disposing of them [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8] This ‘dead storage’ of devices represents a problem to the transition towards a circular economy, that is, a “regenerative system in which resource input and waste, emission, and energy leakage are minimised by slowing, closing, and narrowing material and energy loops” [9] Dead storage amounts to a serious leak in the material loops of the economy: When end-of-life devices sit idle in consumers’ homes, they cannot be re-used or recycled for the production of new devices This is problematic because many electronic devices contain raw materials in finite supply (such as copper, gold, palladium, and silver). It is important to understand why consumers choose to keep their end-of-life devices

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.