How teaching surgeons communicate: An analysis of intraoperative discourse among male and female surgeons

Abstract

BackgroundOur objective was to compare the use of agentic (“I”) and communal (“we”) spoken intraoperative discourse between male and female attending and resident surgeons. MethodsWe analyzed transcripts involving attending and resident surgeons from 5 specialties at a single Midwestern academic teaching hospital. We adapted and expanded Grebelsky-Lichtman's codes, assessed rater agreement, and systematically coded transcripts for agentic and communal terms. Differences between genders and roles were evaluated using Mann-Whitney U tests. ResultsIn the operating room, attendings used significantly more Action Demands, Rationality, Collective Speech, Passive Speech, Nurturing Speech, and Degree Modifiers. Conversely, residents used significantly more Assertive Speech, and Display Solution. Attendings were also more likely to use Action Demands combined with Passive Speech. No significant gender differences were found in any categories. ConclusionsLanguage use in the OR is more closely associated with professional role rather than gender and may reflect underlying power dynamics and the nature of the surgical teaching environment.