Abstract

The aim of the study was to examine how social care beneficiaries rate the relative harmfulness of tobacco/nicotine-containing products compared to traditional cigarettes. This information is crucial for the development of effective tobacco control strategies targeting disadvantaged populations. The cross-sectional study covered 1817 respondents who were taking advantage of social aid services offered by the local social care institutions in the Piotrkowski district, via face-to-face interviews. The linear regression analysis indicated that relative to women, men consider slim cigarettes, smokeless tobacco and e-cigarettes to be more harmful than traditional cigarettes (p < 0.05). The smokers of traditional cigarettes reported menthol cigarettes to be less harmful than traditional cigarettes, relative to the non-smokers (p = 0.05). The current results demonstrate that social care beneficiaries are not aware of the fact that some products are less harmful than others. Education concerning tobacco/nicotine products should include advice on how to reduce the adverse health effects of smoking (e.g., avoiding inhalation of combusted products), while driving the awareness that no nicotine-containing products are safe.

Highlights

  • There is no doubt whatsoever that tobacco is the leading cause of death and disability [1,2].While overall smoking rates among adults are slowly declining in Europe, disparities related to gender, race/ethnicity and socio-economic status (SES) persist [3]

  • The aim of the study was to examine how adult social care beneficiaries rate the relative harmfulness of tobacco products, including slim and menthol cigarettes, water pipes as well as e-cigarettes and smokeless tobacco, as compared to traditional cigarettes

  • The current study indicates a high prevalence of smoking among social care beneficiaries in the Piotrkowski district

Read more

Summary

Introduction

While overall smoking rates among adults are slowly declining in Europe, disparities related to gender, race/ethnicity and socio-economic status (SES) persist [3]. Smoking is directly correlated with income level and education. As the level of disadvantage increases, smoking rates increase [4]. 26% of adults from the United States of America (USA) who are below, and 14% of those who are at or above poverty level, smoke cigarettes [5]. In Poland, based on the data from the Global Adult Tobacco Survey, the highest prevalence of smoking is observed among the least educated groups—smoking prevalence in 2009–2010 was 42% among those who completed education of 9 years or less versus 25% among those with over 12 years of completed education [6]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call