Abstract

The “quantum complexity” of a unitary operator measures the difficulty of its construction from a set of elementary quantum gates. While the notion of quantum complexity was first introduced as a quantum generalization of the classical computational complexity, it has since been argued to hold a fundamental significance in its own right, as a physical quantity analogous to the thermodynamic entropy. In this paper, we present a unified perspective on various notions of quantum complexity, viewed as functions on the space of unitary operators. One striking feature of these functions is that they can exhibit non-smooth and even fractal behaviour. We use ideas from Diophantine approximation theory and sub-Riemannian geometry to rigorously quantify this lack of smoothness. Implications for the physical meaning of quantum complexity are discussed.

Highlights

  • Background to resultsFor the gate complexity eq (2.1), let A denote the group generated by elements of A and their inverses, which by assumption is dense in G

  • We present a unified perspective on various notions of quantum complexity, viewed as functions on the space of unitary operators

  • As → 0, C (U ) tends to a nowhere continuous function on the group G, analogous to the nowhere continuous Dirichlet function of real analysis. (Notice that for a finite group with A = G, C0 recovers the “word metric” studied in geometric group theory; we refer to ref. [14] for a discussion of analogies between geometric group theory and quantum complexity.)

Read more

Summary

Three notions of quantum complexity

The classical notion of computational complexity, for example based on Boolean circuits, operates in discrete time with a discrete set of elementary operations. Both the discrete gate complexity C (U ) and the continuous complexity distance C(U, V ) exhibit similar worst-case exponential scaling [4] in N to the circuit depth σ(U ) It is usually assumed that these definitions are more-or-less equivalent from the viewpoint of quantum computing [1, 13], and differ only in their ease of calculation. We first prove the existence of efficiently universal gate sets for which C (U ) exhibits worst-case scaling in , C (U ) = Ω(log 1/ ), densely in G This clarifies the manner in which C (U ) tends to a nowhere continuous function as → 0. These results give precise meaning to various qualitative discussions of the “fractal” geometry of quantum complexity in the literature

Background to results
Locality versus non-locality
Riemannian complexity geometry
Sub-Riemannian complexity geometry
Complexity distance versus gate complexity
Discussion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.