Abstract
some disturbing news was reported in the March 2005 issue of Significance , a publication of the Royal Statistical Society ([7][1]). Based on a variety of audits, it was found that 38% of the articles published in 2001 in Nature contained some statistical “incongruence”: a disparity between
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
