Abstract

some disturbing news was reported in the March 2005 issue of Significance , a publication of the Royal Statistical Society ([7][1]). Based on a variety of audits, it was found that 38% of the articles published in 2001 in Nature contained some statistical “incongruence”: a disparity between

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call