Abstract

ABSTRACT Although sex education has been found to improve young people’s sexual and reproductive health, no formal programmes exist in Saudi Arabia. This study aims to assess the views of stakeholders on the need for sex education programmes for adolescents in Saudi Arabia, suggested forms of provision, and views on the information provided in Science and Religion curricula. Twenty-eight semi-structured interviews were conducted with policy-makers, healthcare providers, teachers and religious scholars. Thematic analysis was undertaken. Unanimity was expressed on the need for school-based sex education programmes. When asked who should deliver them, stakeholders differentiated between who should be in charge of designing the programmes and who should deliver them. Tension was evident on the role of religious scholars within these two phases of implementation. The inclusion of information that might seem to ‘encourage sinful’ premarital sexual experience was contentious. Although scientific and religious messaging strategies were viewed as non-contradictory, opinions differed as to which messaging strategy to focus on. Information in the 2013 curricula was criticised by some as inaccurate, promoting an ‘othering’ of Westerner and inciting fear. However, more recent curricula have omitted several of these criticised passages and may provide an opportunity to expand the focus on sexual health-related topics within the curriculum.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.