Abstract

Aims and MethodA cross-sectional survey was conducted to investigate the safety of rooms used by medical staff to interview patients in out-patient and in-patient settings of a mental health trust. An assessment tool was designed, and examined the features of an interview room that were likely to promote safety.ResultsThe survey included 112 rooms and demonstrated shortcomings that compromised interview room safety. Rooms were frequently overcrowded with furniture (n=30), cluttered with loose objects (n=101, 90%) and used for multiple purposes (n=82, 73%). Room layout often compromised either access to alarm systems (n=51, 46%) or exit from rooms (n=99, 88%). Necessary facilities for summoning assistance were found to be lacking.Clinical ImplicationsThe safety of interview rooms has not been emphasised sufficiently within everyday working practice and should be revisited.

Highlights

  • There are increasing concerns regarding violence directed of Health, 1999a)

  • In 1998 the Department of Health set targets to reduce incidents of violence and aggression by 20% by 2001 and 30% by 2003 (Department of Health, 1998)

  • In 2000/2001 there was an increase of 30% over 1998/1999, with 84 214 incidents of violence and aggression against NHS staff reported (Department of Health, 1999a, 2001a)

Read more

Summary

AIMS AND METHOD

A cross-sectional survey was conducted to investigate the safety of rooms used by medical staff to interview patients in out-patient and in-patient settings of a mental health trust. An assessment tool was designed, and examined the features of an interview room that were likely to promote safety

RESULTS
Method
Results
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call