Abstract

The load a tephra fall deposit applies to an underlying surface is a key factor controlling its potential to damage a wide range of assets including buildings, trees, crops and powerlines. Though it has long been recognised that loading can increase when deposits absorb rainfall, few efforts have been made to quantify likely load increases. This study builds on previous theoretical work, using an experimental approach to quantify change in load as a function of grainsize distribution, rainfall intensity and duration. A total of 20 laboratory experiments were carried out for ~ 10-cm thick, dry tephra deposits of varying grainsize and grading, taken to represent different eruptive scenarios (e.g. stable, waxing or waning plume). Tephra was deposited onto a 15° impermeable slope (representing a low pitch roof) and exposed to simulated heavy rainfalls of 35 and 70 mm h−1 for durations of up to 2 h. Across all experiments, the maximum load increases ranged from 18 to 30%. Larger increases occurred in fine-grained to medium-grained deposits or in inversely graded deposits, as these retained water more efficiently. The lowest increases occurred in normally graded deposits as rain was unable to infiltrate to the deposit’s base. In deposits composed entirely of coarse tephra, high drainage rates meant the amount of water absorbed was controlled by the deposit’s capillary porosity, rather than its total porosity, resulting in load increases that were smaller than expected. These results suggest that, for low pitch roofs, the maximum deposit load increase due to rainfall is around 30%, significantly lower than the oft-referenced 100%. To complement our experimental results, field measurements of tephra thickness should be supplemented with tephra loading measurements, wherever possible, especially when measurements are made at or near the site of observed damage.

Highlights

  • When tephra fall accumulates on buildings, it can result in a wide range of damage, with the most severe being complete building collapse

  • This study presents the results of 20 rainfall simulation experiments examining how grainsize distribution and rainfall intensity influence the loads exhibited by tephra fall deposits

  • The loads increased by between 18% and 30%, far below the 100% increase which is often assumed and referenced in tephra fall hazard and risk assessments

Read more

Summary

Introduction

When tephra fall accumulates on buildings, it can result in a wide range of damage, with the most severe being complete building collapse. The first tephra fall building damage survey, conducted by Spence et al (1996), following the 1991 eruption of Pinatubo in the Philippines, noted that typhoon rains would have increased the tephra loads sustained by buildings and that in situ deposit density measurements would have been useful to quantify the increase. Despite the potential value of these measurements having been recognised, in situ tephra deposit densities are rarely recorded during post-eruption building damage surveys Reasons given for this include time constraints in the field (Mcsporran 2019), use of remote damage assessment techniques (Williams et al 2020; Biass et al 2021) or that at the time a damage survey was conducted, it was not intended to compare damage with hazard intensity (Hayes et al 2019). If tephra deposits had absorbed rainfall, the dry deposit density assumed by Williams et al (2020) would have underestimated tephra loads on roofs, meaning these buildings may be more resistant to damage than the study’s vulnerability models suggest

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call