Abstract
Water-impounding foliage (=tank) characterizes many bromeliad species but, to date, a quantitative evaluation of the effectiveness of these structures to bridge rainless periods is not available. We present a model that analyses the capacity of these phytotelmata to supply moisture to the bromeliad as a function of plant size, and parameterize it for two epiphyte species,Tillandsia fasciculataandGuzmania monostachya. All parameters related to the recharging of a tank (e.g. catchment area, or tank capacity) and those related to water loss from the tank (e.g. tank water surface, or water absorption from the tank by the plant) changed with plant size. For both species a similar qualitative size-related pattern emerged: smaller individuals dried out much faster than larger conspecifics. Modelling the changes in tank water content for an entire year revealed that in the seasonal climate of Barro Colorado Island, Panama, tanks of smaller plants (1 g d. wt) are expected to lack water for up to 110 d (inT. fasciculata). Regardless of plant size, individuals ofG. monostachyawere consistently more efficient thanT. fasciculatain maintaining moisture in their tanks. Our results provide insight into the limitations of water-impounding tanks as an adaptation to cope with an intermittent water supply typical for epiphytic habitats. These limitations are particularly pronounced for smaller individuals.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.