Abstract

BackgroundTo investigate the association between isolated and combined affective and cognitive impairments with functional outcomes and discharge destination in older patients admitted to rehabilitation after a hip fracture.MethodsProspective study in 612 community-dwelling patients aged 65 years and over, admitted to rehabilitation after surgery for hip fracture. Information on socio-demographics, medical, functional, affective, and cognitive status was systematically collected at admission. Functional status, length of stay and destination were assessed at discharge. Functional improvement was defined as any gain on the Barthel Index score between admission and discharge from rehabilitation.ResultsAt admission, 8.2% of the patients had isolated affective impairment, 27.5% had cognitive impairment only, and 7.5% had combined impairments. Rate of functional improvement steadily decreased from 91.2% in patients with no cognitive nor affective impairment to 73.8% in those with combined impairments. Compared to patients without any impairment, those with combined impairments had lower odds of functional improvement, even after adjustment for age, gender, health and functional status at admission (adjOR: 0.40; 95%CI: 0.16–1.0; p = .049). The proportion of patients discharged back home gradually decreased from 82.8% among patients without any impairment to only 45.6% in patients with combined impairments. In multivariate analysis, the odds of returning home remained significantly reduced in these latter patients (adjOR: 0.31; 95%CI:0.15–0.66; p = .002).ConclusionsAffective and cognitive impairments had both independent, and synergistic negative association with functional outcome and discharge destination in patients admitted to rehabilitation after a hip fracture. Nevertheless, patients with combined affective and cognitive impairments still achieved significant functional improvement, even though its magnitude was reduced. Further studies should investigate whether these patients would benefit from better targeted, longer, or more intensive rehabilitation interventions to optimize their functional recovery.

Highlights

  • To investigate the association between isolated and combined affective and cognitive impairments with functional outcomes and discharge destination in older patients admitted to rehabilitation after a hip fracture

  • Functional outcomes Overall, 88.3% of the patients improved on the Barthel Index score during their rehabilitation stay, whereas 7.7% remained stable, and only 4.3% further declined

  • The proportion of patients with in-hospital functional improvement steadily declined according to the presence of mental impairment, from 91.2% in patients without any impairment, to 88.4% in patients with isolated affective impairment, 86.1% in patients with isolated cognitive impairment, and 73.8% in patients with combined impairments

Read more

Summary

Introduction

To investigate the association between isolated and combined affective and cognitive impairments with functional outcomes and discharge destination in older patients admitted to rehabilitation after a hip fracture. About 40 to 70% of hip fracture patients do not regain their pre-fracture functional status [2,3,4]. Several previous studies investigated the association between patients’ characteristics and functional outcome after rehabilitation following hip fracture surgery. Comorbidity, poor nutritional status, and low pre-fracture functional status, cognitive as well as affective impairments have been associated with. Very few studies tried to disentangle the independent as well as combined impact of cognitive and affective impairments: results suggest that isolated cognitive or affective impairment reduces the likelihood of functional improvement, or its magnitude, with an amplified impact when combined. Previous studies relied on small sample sizes and used different functional outcomes, such as mobility, activities of daily living, or Barthel Index score, along with different time frames to measure improvement [15, 16]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call