Abstract

Reaching movements towards an object are continuously guided by visual information about the target and the arm. Such guidance increases precision and allows one to adjust the movement if the target unexpectedly moves. On-going arm movements are also influenced by motion in the surrounding. Fast responses to motion in the surrounding could help cope with moving obstacles and with the consequences of changes in one’s eye orientation and vantage point. To further evaluate how motion in the surrounding influences interceptive movements we asked subjects to tap a moving target when it reached a second, static target. We varied the direction and location of motion in the surrounding, as well as details of the stimuli that are known to influence eye movements. Subjects were most sensitive to motion in the background when such motion was near the targets. Whether or not the eyes were moving, and the direction of the background motion in relation to the direction in which the eyes were moving, had very little influence on the response to the background motion. We conclude that the responses to background motion are driven by motion near the target rather than by a global analysis of the optic flow and its relation with other information about self-motion.

Highlights

  • It is long known that people use visual information to guide their on-going goal-directed movements (e.g. [1,2])

  • We found a significant influence of background motion on the mean vertical error (F2,18 = 37.3; p

  • We found a significant interaction between background motion and target speed (F2,18 = 9.1; p = 0.002): the background’s influence was slightly smaller for the faster targets

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It is long known that people use visual information to guide their on-going goal-directed movements (e.g. [1,2]). It is long known that people use visual information to guide their on-going goal-directed movements Many studies have demonstrated that visual information is used to guide on-going movements by showing that people respond to externally imposed changes. In accordance with the idea that visual information normally continuously guides the hand, people respond to changes even if they do not notice the changes [5,14,15,16]. They are unable to suppress such responses [17,18,19], probably because the PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0119903. They are unable to suppress such responses [17,18,19], probably because the PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0119903 March 13, 2015

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call