Abstract

The fact that children are far more likely to successfully acquire a variety of new skills and knowledge than are adults is so clearly evidenced in everyday life that it hardly needs scientific confirmation. However, despite four decades of intensive research, the reason why remains controversial. In fact, the terms of the debate about critical periods in language have hardly changed since the 1960s. I argue that this is because the standard in-lab research paradigms that have otherwise served psychology well are fundamentally ill-suited to the study of critical and sensitive periods. In particular, this research requires samples that are far more diverse and orders of magnitude larger than can be achieved in the lab. I show that massive online experiments provide an exciting and productive alternative.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call