Abstract
Using a previously validated agent-based model with fundamentalists and chartists, we investigate the usefulness and impact of direct market intervention. The policy maker diagnoses bubbles by forming an expectation of the future returns, then invests in burgeoning bubbles to develop a sufficient inventory of the risky asset in order to be able to sell adequate amounts of the overpriced asset later countercyclically to fight market exuberance. Preventing bubbles and crashes, this market intervention improves all analysed market return metrics, volatility, skewness, kurtosis and VaR, without affecting long-term growth. This increases the Sharpe ratios of noise traders and of fundamentalists by approximately 28% and 45% respectively. The results are robust even for substantially miscalibrated long-term expected returns.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.