Abstract

To compare cancer detection rates according to the number of biopsy cores in patients on whom a repeat prostate biopsy was performed for atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP). The data of 4950 consecutive patients on whom prostate biopsies were performed were assessed retrospectively. A total of 107 patients were identified as having ASAP following an initial prostate biopsy, and they were included in the study. A six-core prostate biopsy (PBx) was performed on 15 of the 107 patients, 12 PBx on 32 patients, and 20 PBx on 60 patients. Cancer detection rates were compared according to the number of biopsy cores. The localization of the cancer foci was also evaluated. The cancer detection rates in patients on whom 6 PBx, 12 PBx, and 20 PBx were performed were 20% (3/15), 31% (10/32), and 58% (35/60), respectively, and a statistically significant difference was found (p = 0.005). When cancer detection rates in patients with total prostate specific antigen (PSA) < 10ng/mL, PSA density ≥ 0.15, normal digital rectal examination, and prostate volume ≥ 55mL were compared according to the number of biopsy cores, a significant difference was identified (p = 0.02, 0.03, 0.006, and 0.04, respectively). Seventy-five percent of the foci where cancer was detected were at the same and/or adjacent sites as the ASAP foci in the initial biopsy, and 54% were identified in contralateral biopsies in which ASAP foci were present. As the biopsy core number increases, the cancer detection rate increases significantly in patients on whom a repeat biopsy is performed due to ASAP. The highest cancer rate is found in 20-core repeat biopsies performed equally from all foci.

Highlights

  • Prostate cancer is one of the most common cancer in men [1]

  • The mean age, total PSA (tPSA), PSA density (PSAD), and prostate volume values of the 107 patients included in the study were 63.33 ± 7.00, 8.01 ± 4.68, 0.18 ± 0.15, and 48.31 ± 22.15, respectively

  • No significant difference was determined between age, tPSA, PSAD, and prostate volumes of the patients on whom a 6-core, 12-core, or 20-core repeat biopsy was performed (P values 0.305, 0,684, 0.455, and 0.347, respectively) (Table-1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Prostate cancer is one of the most common cancer in men [1]. Prostate biopsy is the standard method used to diagnose prostate cancer. Biopsy procedures in organs with cancers are usually carried out for the histopathological assessment of tumors diagnosed clinically. This is done to confirm tumor suspicion in other instances, such as T1 prostate cancer. While positive biopsy results can verify a prostate cancer diagnosis, negative biopsies may cause the persistence of cancer suspicion [2]. High serum total prostate specific antigen (PSA) and/or prostate cancer suspicion in digital rectal examinations require prostate biopsies. Histopathological findings identified in the initial biopsy, in addition to findings of PSA parameters and digital rectal examination (DRE), are important in deciding whether or not to perform a repeat biopsy

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call