Abstract
• Mathematical model of aquifer recharge and discharge is analyzed. • Timescale required to effectively reach steady state is considered. • Mean action time used to show how timescale depends on model parameters. • Theoretical timescales compare well with new laboratory measurements. Groundwater flow models are usually characterized as being either transient flow models or steady state flow models. Given that steady state groundwater flow conditions arise as a long time asymptotic limit of a particular transient response, it is natural for us to seek a finite estimate of the amount of time required for a particular transient flow problem to effectively reach steady state. Here, we introduce the concept of mean action time (MAT) to address a fundamental question: how long does it take for a groundwater recharge process or discharge processes to effectively reach steady state? This concept relies on identifying a cumulative distribution function, F ( t ; x ), which varies from F (0; x ) = 0 to F ( t ; x ) → 1 − as t → ∞, thereby providing us with a measurement of the progress of the system towards steady state. The MAT corresponds to the mean of the associated probability density function f ( t ; x ) = d F /d t , and we demonstrate that this framework provides useful analytical insight by explicitly showing how the MAT depends on the parameters in the model and the geometry of the problem. Additional theoretical results relating to the variance of f ( t ; x ), known as the variance of action time (VAT), are also presented. To test our theoretical predictions we include measurements from a laboratory-scale experiment describing flow through a homogeneous porous medium. The laboratory data confirms that the theoretical MAT predictions are in good agreement with measurements from the physical model.
Highlights
Groundwater flow systems, and the corresponding models used to study these 3 systems, are typically characterized as being either transient or steady state 4 (Remson et al 1971; Bear 1972; Clement et al 1994; Haitjema 1995; Strack 5 1989; Wang and Anderson 1982; Zheng 2002)
In this work we introduce the concept of mean action time (MAT) which gives us a finite estimate of the amount of time required for a transient groundwater flow resposne to effectively reach steady state
We demonstrate the practicality of our theoretical predictions from Sec[268] tions 2.1–2.2 by considering new datasets derived from aquifer recharge and 269 discharge experiments completed in our laboratory
Summary
Groundwater flow systems, and the corresponding models used to study these 3 systems, are typically characterized as being either transient or steady state 4 (Remson et al 1971; Bear 1972; Clement et al 1994; Haitjema 1995; Strack 5 1989; Wang and Anderson 1982; Zheng 2002). This characterization is useful 6 since the mathematical and computational techniques required to solve steady 7 state groundwater flow models are generally much simpler than those required 8 to solve transient groundwater flow models.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
