Abstract

The interaction between phenotypic plasticity, e.g. learning, and evolution is an important topic both in Evolutionary Biology and Machine Learning. The evolution of learning is commonly studied in Evolutionary Biology, while the use of an evolutionary process to improve learning is of interest to the field of Machine Learning. This paper takes a different point of view by studying the effect of learning on the evolutionary process, the so-called Baldwin effect. A well-studied result in the literature about the Baldwin effect is that learning affects the speed of convergence of the evolutionary process towards some genetic configuration, which corresponds to the environment-induced plastic response. This paper demonstrates that learning can change the outcome of evolution, i.e., lead to a genetic configuration that does not correspond to the plastic response. Results are obtained both analytically and experimentally by means of an agent-based model of a foraging task, in an environment where the distribution of resources follows seasonal cycles and the foraging success on different resource types is conditioned by trade-offs that can be evolved and learned. This paper attempts to answer a question that has been overlooked: whether learning has an effect on what genotypic traits are evolved, i.e. the selection of a trait that enables a plastic response changes the selection pressure on a different trait, in what could be described as co-evolution between different traits in the same genome.

Highlights

  • The so called Baldwin effect [1] is a much debated theory in the literature of evolution [2] about how new features are inherited by an individual with phenotypic plasticity [3,4,5]

  • The working definition of the Baldwin effect used in this paper is: plasticity is a “positive driving force of evolution” that affects the selection pressure such that “standing genetic variation can be selected upon so that evolution can proceed in the direction of the induced plastic response” [8]

  • The Baldwin effect describes the evolution of a “target” genotypic trait that corresponds to the environment-induced plastic response at the phenotypic level

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The so called Baldwin effect [1] is a much debated theory in the literature of evolution [2] about how new features are inherited by an individual with phenotypic plasticity [3,4,5] Baldwin proposed this new “factor in evolution” [1] to explain how complex features such as an eye can evolve [6,7,8], as an alternative to the -popular Lamarckian evolution which assumed that traits acquired by an individual through phenotypic plasticity would be transferred directly to its offspring’s genome [9]. The working definition of the Baldwin effect used in this paper is: plasticity is a “positive driving force of evolution” that affects the selection pressure such that “standing genetic variation can be selected upon so that evolution can proceed in the direction of the induced plastic response” [8] According to this definition, the Baldwin effect describes the evolution of a “target” genotypic trait that corresponds to the environment-induced plastic response at the phenotypic level. This definition is especially relevant when considering biologically inspired optimization techniques [13]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call