Abstract
SUMMARY This paper examines recent proposals and research suggesting that artificial intelligence (AI) adoption should be delayed until its potential harms are fully understood. Conclusions on the social optimality of delayed AI adoption are shown to be sensitive to assumptions about the process by which regulators learn about the salience of particular harms. When such learning is by doing – based on the real-world adoption of AI – this generally favours acceleration of AI adoption to surface and react to potential harms more quickly. This case is strengthened when AI adoption is potentially reversible. This paper examines how different conclusions regarding the optimality of accelerated or delayed AI adoption influence and are influenced by other policies that may moderate AI harm.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
