Abstract
Research background: SMEs encounter more survival impediments than larger businesses. Innovativeness is a crucial attribute for smaller firms to overcome these barriers since it positively influences their performance, competitiveness, and capability to operate in the long term. However, depending on firm characteristics, the innovativeness of SMEs might differ.
 Purpose of the article: This research investigates whether the innovativeness of family-owned SMEs differs depending on their size, sector, area of activity, and succession on the sample of 350 family-owned SMEs that operate in Czechia.
 Methods: The data collected in the Czech Republic in 2020 through the structured self-administered questionnaire were analyzed using Skewness-Kurtosis and Levene's normality tests and Independent Sample T-test to find the differences in SMEs innovativeness depending on their selected characteristics.
 Findings & value added: According to the results, SMEs' innovativeness differs depending on their size, industry, and area activity. On the other hand, the analyses confirmed the nonexistence of the differences in SMEs' innovative-ness concerning succession involvement. The region of SMEs' operation, the scope of their activities, and firms' executives' age might be crucial arguments to explain the differences and similarities in these enterprises' innovativeness. Even though the research focuses only on the SMEs located in Czechia, the similarity of the issues all SMEs face when competing with the larger firms worldwide, especially if we take into consideration the countries with a similar level of development and overall institutional business conditions, allows for generalizing our results and might draw readers' attention to this paper. Policymakers, universities, international institutions, and financial institutions might cooperate to create industrial zones, encourage research centers, and provide education and financial support to stimulate SMEs' innovative activities.
Highlights
The majority of family businesses belong to the segment of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) (Grundström et al, 2012; Marjański & Sułkowski, 2021), which means they employ a maximum of 249 workers as is defined by the European Commission's classification (2003)
SMEs' innovativeness differ depending on firm size and sector. This fact supports the hypotheses H1 and H2 that presume the existence of differences between the mean volumes of smaller-larger and manufacturingservice firms
Most SMEs sustainably compete during their life cycle with larger enterprises, competitors with higher financial capabilities
Summary
The majority of family businesses belong to the segment of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) (Grundström et al, 2012; Marjański & Sułkowski, 2021), which means they employ a maximum of 249 workers as is defined by the European Commission's classification (2003). SMEs make significant contributions to governments' tax income, workforce (Dvorský et al, 2020), and countries' GDP (Belas et al, 2020; Agbim, 2020; Civelek et al, 2020) Since they face with more financial problems when competing with their larger sized rivals (Kramoliš & Dobeš, 2020), they might be more fragile when operating in complex environments (Virglerova et al, 2020). A firm's innovativeness might differ depending on SMEs' characteristics (Coen Rigtering et al, 2014; Filser et al, 2018)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
