Abstract
Abstract This commentary, on an article by Satz and White, argues that redistribution of wealth for the purpose of advancing equality (rather than improving the worst off) can be provided an institutional defence. The argument is that major institutions of society—the market, the legal system, the educational system, and agency regulation—perform their social functions most effectively when inequality is not too high.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
