How Important Is Sexual Conflict?

Abstract

Next article No AccessHow Important Is Sexual Conflict?David Hosken and Rhonda SnookDavid Hosken Search for more articles by this author and Rhonda Snook Search for more articles by this author 1. Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter in Cornwall, Tremough, Penryn, Cornwall TR10 9EZ, United Kingdom;2. Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, Alfred Denny Building, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TN, United KingdomPDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The American Naturalist Volume 165, Number S5May 2005HOW IMPORTANT IS SEXUAL CONFLICT?A Special Issue Edited by David Hosken and Rhonda Snook Published for The American Society of Naturalists Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/429355 Views: 127Total views on this site Citations: 25Citations are reported from Crossref © 2005 by The University of Chicago.PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Marcus Lee, Carlota Solano Udina, Lars-Anders Hansson Fear of sex: sexual conflict exposed as avoidance in a parthenogenetic invertebrate, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 75, no.88 (Jul 2021).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-021-03054-9David J. Hosken, C. Ruth Archer, Clarissa M. House, Nina Wedell Penis evolution across species: divergence and diversity, Nature Reviews Urology 16, no.22 (Nov 2018): 98–106.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-018-0112-zRebecah E. Ford, Stephen C. Weeks, E. Hebets Intersexual conflict in androdioecious clam shrimp: Do androdioecious hermaphrodites evolve to avoid mating with males?, Ethology 124, no.55 (Apr 2018): 357–364.https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12738Linda C. Hernández Duran, Gonzalo E. Fajardo Medina, Luz S. Fuentes Quintero Mating Opportunities in Sangalopsis veliterna Females: Costs and Benefits, Journal of Insect Science 14, no.112112 (Aug 2014): 1–9.https://doi.org/10.1673/031.014.112Akanksha Singh, Bashisth N. Singh Role of sexual selection in speciation in Drosophila, Genetica 142, no.11 (Dec 2013): 23–41.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-013-9751-4Krista M. Milich, Janice M. Bahr, Rebecca M. Stumpf, Colin A. Chapman Timing is everything: expanding the cost of sexual attraction hypothesis, Animal Behaviour 88 (Feb 2014): 219–224.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.11.029Ryne A. Palombit Sexual Conflict in Nonhuman Primates, (Jan 2014): 191–280.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800286-5.00005-5Abderrahman Khila, Ehab Abouheif, Locke Rowe Function, Developmental Genetics, and Fitness Consequences of a Sexually Antagonistic Trait, Science 336, no.60816081 (May 2012): 585–589.https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1217258Adrian L. O'Loghlen, Stephen I. Rothstein, Jane M. Waterman When Less Is Best: Female Brown-Headed Cowbirds Prefer Less Intense Male Displays, PLoS ONE 7, no.55 (May 2012): e36130.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036130Rebecca M. Stumpf, Rodolfo Martinez-Mota, Krista M. Milich, Nicoletta Righini, Milena R. Shattuck Sexual conflict in primates, Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews 20, no.22 (Apr 2011): 62–75.https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.20297Matthew D. Hall, Simon P. Lailvaux, Mark W. Blows, Robert C. Brooks SEXUAL CONFLICT AND THE MAINTENANCE OF MULTIVARIATE GENETIC VARIATION, Evolution 64, no.66 (Dec 2009): 1697–1703.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00932.xAdrian L. O’Loghlen, Stephen I. Rothstein Multimodal signalling in a songbird: male audiovisual displays vary significantly by social context in brown-headed cowbirds, Animal Behaviour 79, no.66 (Jun 2010): 1285–1292.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.03.001Ryne A. Palombit Conflict and Bonding Between the Sexes, (Sep 2009): 53–83.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02725-3_3John Archer Does sexual selection explain human sex differences in aggression?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32, no.3-43-4 (Aug 2009): 249.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X09990951KRISTA K. INGRAM, TORSTEN LAAMANEN, NALINI PUNIAMOORTHY, RUDOLF MEIER Lack of morphological coevolution between male forelegs and female wings in Themira (Sepsidae: Diptera: Insecta), Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 93, no.22 (Jan 2008): 227–238.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00922.xDarryl T. Gwynne Sexual Conflict over Nuptial Gifts in Insects, Annual Review of Entomology 53, no.11 (Jan 2008): 83–101.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.53.103106.093423Y Teuschl, DJ Hosken, WU Blanckenhorn Is reduced female survival after mating a by-product of male-male competition in the dung fly Sepsis cynipsea?, BMC Evolutionary Biology 7, no.11 (Oct 2007).https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-7-194Karim Vahed Comparative evidence for a cost to males of manipulating females in bushcrickets, Behavioral Ecology 18, no.33 (Mar 2007): 499–506.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arm021Karim Vahed All that Glisters is not Gold: Sensory Bias, Sexual Conflict and Nuptial Feeding in Insects and Spiders, Ethology 113, no.22 (Feb 2007): 105–127.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2006.01312.xPaul I. Ward Postcopulatory Selection in the Yellow Dung Fly Scathophaga stercoraria (L.) and the Mate‐Now‐Choose‐Later Mechanism of Cryptic Female Choice, (Jan 2007): 343–369.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3454(07)37007-1A.V. Peretti, A. Córdoba-Aguilar On the value of fine-scaled behavioural observations for studies of sexual coercion, Ethology Ecology & Evolution 19, no.11 (Jan 2007): 77–86.https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.2007.9522583W. Eberhard Sexually antagonistic coevolution in insects is associated with only limited morphological diversity, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 19, no.33 (May 2006): 657–681.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.01057.xSergey Gavrilets, Takehiko I Hayashi The dynamics of two- and three-way sexual conflicts over mating, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 361, no.14661466 (Jan 2006): 345–354.https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1792David J. Hosken, Paula Stockley Sexual conflict, Current Biology 15, no.1414 (Jul 2005): R535–R536.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.07.014Muhammad Qasim Zaman Review: Beyond Turk and Hindu: Rethinking Religious Identities in Islamicate South Asia, Journal of Islamic Studies 14, no.11 (Jan 2003): 112–116.https://doi.org/10.1093/jis/14.1.112