Abstract

BackgroundInfection is a potentially devastating complication following primary total knee arthroplasty, and the traditional gold-standard treatment for chronic prosthetic joint infection has been in the form of a two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty. This involves a first stage – removal of all implants and infected material, with implantation of a temporary spacer – followed by a second stage which includes reimplantation with a definitive prosthesis. IndicationsAlthough the outcomes of single-stage and two-stage revision arthroplasty surgeries are similar, there are certain indications such as atypical or more virulent organisms, patient factors and soft tissue factors that would favour a two-stage approach. Surgical techniqueThe second stage revision procedure consists of explantation of the spacer with a debridement and synovectomy. Further samples are sent for microbiological analysis. Once the surgical field is clean and lavaged, the definitive prosthesis is implanted. ConclusionsA second stage revision total knee arthroplasty is a reliable procedure for the treatment of chronic prosthetic joint infection. There is a significant re-revision rate, predominantly due to recurrent deep infection.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call