Abstract

Background: Health promoters often use stakeholder groups to jointly plan and implement local interventions. Stakeholder groups should take over responsibility to later run the health promotion program independently. Monitoring this process of capacity building can help health promoters improve the quality of the process. Instruments for the systematic assessment of capacity building among stakeholder groups are scarce. The goal of this study was to develop, and pilot test a generic assessment instrument for setting-based capacity building. Methods: We drafted a semi-standardized monitoring instrument to be used in stakeholder groups in various settings. This “EVA-protocol” (short for evaluation protocol) was based on capacity building domains e.g., leadership, resource mobilization. It was pilot implemented in a research network on increasing an active lifestyle in various settings. The respective health promoters documented 78 meetings of 15 different stakeholder groups. We performed feedback interviews and member checking among the facilitating health promoters, asking for comprehensibility, length, usability and perceived benefits of the instrument. Findings: Data collected in the “EVA-protocol” helped the facilitating health promoters understand the development of competences and capacities in the stakeholder groups and identify factors that favor or hinder the capacity building process. The instrument was rated as user friendly, but it was remarked that it is best filled out by two persons and reflected upon by those to offer the greatest benefit. Not all projects could afford this procedure due to lack of time/staff resources. Conclusions: The drafted instrument can serve as quality management tool for health promoters who facilitate participatory stakeholder groups in different settings and intend to build capacities for sustainable health promotion structures.

Highlights

  • Health promotion programs are more likely to be successful and sustainable if stakeholders and other setting members are actively involved in the process of needs assessment, program planning and implementation [1]

  • In 3/5 subprojects, the facilitating health promoters asked the authors of the “EVA protocol” to attend the first (1–3) meetings of their respective stakeholder groups and to assist with filling out the EVA protocol

  • The analysis has shown that all stakeholder groups were capable of identifying and analyzing assets as well as problems in their settings with regard to physical activity

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Health promotion programs are more likely to be successful and sustainable if stakeholders and other setting members are actively involved in the process of needs assessment, program planning and implementation [1]. In order to assure these processes, experts, e.g., health promotion practitioners, need to build coalitions and networks with setting members, e.g., by implementing participatory formats such as stakeholder groups, and build up community strengths as well as resources [2,3,4]. Stakeholder groups should take over responsibility to later run the health promotion program independently. Monitoring this process of capacity building can help health promoters improve the quality of the process. Methods: We drafted a semi-standardized monitoring instrument to be used in stakeholder groups in various settings

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call