Abstract

In recent times the concept of global civil society has made its appearance on national and international intellectual, as well as political agendas, in a major way. It is of some interest that two other concepts, both of which call for transcendence of national boundaries in precisely the same way as global civil society does, have also made their appearance on the scene of intellectual debates at roughly the same time: the concept of cosmopolitanism and that of transnational justice. All three concepts have dramatically expanded the notion of commitment to one’s fellow beings beyond the nation state. And all three concepts have extended critiques of policies that violate the dignity of human beings from national governments to the practices of inter-national institutions such as the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and the World Trade Forum. In sum the inter-related concepts of global civil society, cosmopolitanism, and transnational justice have greatly enlarged the traditional domain of political theory. And yet for any political theorist who is acutely conscious of the phenomenon of power, these concepts are not unproblematic. For the practices of global civil society may just reinforce the intellectual and the moral power of the West over the postcolonial world. This is particularly true of say global human rights organizations. This paper will attempt to raise some questions of the concept and the practices of global civil society from the perspective of the countries of the South.

Highlights

  • In recent times the concept of global civil society has made its appearance on national and international intellectual, as well as political agendas, in a major way

  • In contrast to modernization theory which rested on largely ahistorical grounds, world systems theory told us that underdevelopment was historically produced; it told us that underdevelopment of the postcolonial world was fated to be reproduced in and through a highly iniquitous and exploitative global system

  • World systems theory suggested that individual countries were located in an international division of labor that served to appropriate and transfer labor and resources of the developing world to the developed world

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In recent times the concept of global civil society has made its appearance on national and international intellectual, as well as political agendas, in a major way. The notion of global civil society sought to capture a distinct phenomenon: the activities of international non-governmental organizations (INGOs)that network across national borders and create a new space of solidarity within the world system. Other demonstrations against authoritarian regimes have shown that global civil society organizations have emerged as a powerful and influential force on the world stage in the realm of norm setting.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call