Abstract

Evidence suggests adolescent self-esteem is influenced by beliefs of how individuals in their reference group perceive them. However, few studies examine how gender- and violence-related social norms affect self-esteem among refugee populations. This paper explores relationships between gender inequitable and victim-blaming social norms, personal attitudes, and self-esteem among adolescent girls participating in a life skills program in three Ethiopian refugee camps. Ordinary least squares multivariable regression analysis was used to assess the associations between attitudes and social norms, and self-esteem. Key independent variables of interest included a scale measuring personal attitudes toward gender inequitable norms, a measure of perceived injunctive norms capturing how a girl believed her family and community would react if she was raped, and a peer-group measure of collective descriptive norms surrounding gender inequity. The key outcome variable, self-esteem, was measured using the Rosenberg self-esteem scale. Girl's personal attitudes toward gender inequitable norms were not significantly predictive of self-esteem at endline, when adjusting for other covariates. Collective peer norms surrounding the same gender inequitable statements were significantly predictive of self-esteem at endline (ß=-0.130; p=0.024). Additionally, perceived injunctive norms surrounding family and community-based sanctions for victims of forced sex were associated with a decline in self-esteem at endline (ß=-0.103; p=0.014). Significant findings for collective descriptive norms and injunctive norms remained when controlling for all three constructs simultaneously. Findings suggest shifting collective norms around gender inequity, particularly at the community and peer levels, may sustainably support the safety and well-being of adolescent girls in refugee settings.

Highlights

  • Collective peer norms surrounding the same gender inequitable statements were significantly predictive of self-esteem at endline (ß = −0.130; p = 0.024)

  • Seminal work by social psychologist Cialdini distinguished between two types of social norms as beliefs: descriptive norms, the belief one has about what others commonly do, and injunctive norms, the belief one has about what others approve and disapprove of (Cialdini et al 2006)

  • Our analysis examines the relationships between selfesteem and three primary constructs: personal attitudes regarding gender role dynamics, injunctive norms regarding sexual violence and collective peer norms toward gender role dynamics

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Scholars in the first stream of thought often refer to norms as the collective behaviors and attitudes shared by a society; what Chung & Rimal (2016) call ‘collective norms’. Scholars in the second stream of thought instead think of norms as beliefs (right or wrong) about other people’s attitudes and behaviors. Personal attitudes may be influenced by social norms, they represent an individual’s own evaluation of a belief or behavior with some level of approval or disapproval (Mackie et al 2015; Young, 2015; Chung & Rimal, 2016; Miller & Prentice, 2016). This paper explores relationships between gender inequitable and victim-blaming social norms, personal attitudes, and self-esteem among adolescent girls participating in a life skills program in three Ethiopian refugee camps

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call