Abstract
There have been some theoretical arguments regarding framing among researchers despite differences over various forms. However, there hasn't been much empirical research done on the actual implementation of these theories. By contrasting important phrases and statements from coverage of Roe v. Wade’s abortion rights case by two major news organizations—the liberal New York Times and the conservative Fox News, this study examines how a conversation that is framed affects people's political media bias. Findings show that news framing plays an important role in influencing the reader’s interpretation of the event. This study is helpful for readers to understand clearly the real-world applications of framing to win others’ support.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Advances in Education, Humanities and Social Science Research
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
