Abstract

Price discrimination fairness research demonstrates that the level of familiarity consumers have with a price discrimination tactic influences their fairness judgments. In this paper, the authors empirically demonstrate that these findings are not universal. Specifically, the findings indicate that the fit between the (a) variables upon which the price discrimination tactic focuses and (b) the decision criteria by which products or services offered by the firm are judged (i.e., fence-context fit) moderates the impact of the familiarity on price discrimination fairness judgments. Two experiments examine how the factors of fence-context fit and familiarity lead to different price discrimination fairness judgments and provide process evidence of a critical affective component of consumer response to price discrimination tactics based on suspicion. The findings provide implications for managers to carefully consider price discrimination policies by taking adequate precautions in an effort to reduce perceptions of unfairness.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.