Abstract

Financial crises have become a challenge for sustainable growth, given the frequency and intensity of crisis shocks and their destructive consequences in recent decades. The paper aims to study how the endogenously generated excess money supply can contribute to global financial crises. The creation of money supply is examined from the perspective of the Quantity Theory of Money (QTM) and endogenous money, namely Horizontalism, Structuralism, and Modern Money Theory. Given that prices are not flexible in the short term, increased volatility in the money market prevents a short-term ready balance between money supply and output. The overall result of money supply accommodation can be unpredictable if monetary authorities and commercial banks do not pool their interests, and the money demand volatility becomes extremely high. The study of the correlation between money supply and output allowed distinguishing between neutral countries in the creation of extra liquid assets and countries that can be a potential trigger for excessive money supply volatility. Monitoring the dynamics of M3 and GDP showed that before the significant crisis periods of 1997–1998, 2007–2008, and 2019–2020, the growth of money supply was more than 8%. The established critical level confirms the potential contribution of endogenously created excess money supply to global financial crises.

Highlights

  • The creation of money supply is examined from the perspective of the Quantity Theory of Money (QTM) and endogenous money, namely Horizontalism, Structuralism, and Modern Money Theory

  • This paper aims to study whether the endogenously created excess money supply can contribute to global financial crises

  • The creation of excess money supply is viewed from the perspective of QTM and endogenous money

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Modern monetary institutions have shifted to the The structuralist approach alleviates the disadindirect instrument, short-run nominal interest vantage mentioned above and expands the set of rate, which is widely used to adjust the money sup- tools for money supply accommodation. The structuralist’s supply curve takes a semi emphasized that by shifting to an indirect interest position between the horizontal and vertical LM rate in exchange of a direct monetary aggregate in- schedules, assuming the money supply does not strument to maintain the target lending rate, the fully accommodate the demand due to different monetary authority’s duty is to meet the banking impediments provided by additional instruments. Banks and Bank Systems, Volume 16, Issue 3, 2021 Source: Authors’ elaboration

RESULTS
Findings
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call