Abstract

We show how one can be led from considerations of quantum steering to Bell's theorem. We begin with Einstein's demonstration that, assuming local realism, quantum states must be in a many-to-one ("incomplete") relationship with the real physical states of the system. We then consider some simple constraints that local realism imposes on any such incomplete model of physical reality, and show they are not satisfiable. In particular, we present a very simple demonstration for the absence of a local hidden variable incomplete description of nature by steering to two ensembles, one of which contains a pair of non-orthogonal states. Historically this is not how Bell's theorem arose - there are slight and subtle differences in the arguments - but it could have been.

Highlights

  • In this paper we attempt a little revisionist history

  • For our purposes it is only important that the separation hypothesis, together with the assumption of ‘real states of real systems’ implies local realism, it potentially encompasses more

  • As X5 is the integral of a probability density it must be positive, in the face of this it is clear that the assumption of local realism, upon which the whole discussion is premised, must be false - this is Bell’s Theorem

Read more

Summary

EINSTEIN’S LESS FAMOUS ARGUMENT FOR INCOMPLETENESS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS

In June of 1935 Einstein wrote to Schrodinger [1] bemoaning that the EPR paper [2] ‘buried in the erudition’ the simplicity of the point he was trying to make [3] In this letter he defines completeness of a state description as. In a moment we will emphasize why the choice of different (and incompatible) measurements on A was a necessary part of his argument (and amusingly he points out, contra-EPR, that he ‘doesn’t give a damn’ whether the states ΨB, ΨB are eigenfunctions of observables on B!), but first let’s note that this description of all the possible ensembles achievable in such experiments was subsequently carefully characterized by Schrodinger who, within a year, proved the quantum steering theorem [5, 6]: Theorem 1. We begin by showing that steering between two ensembles of orthogonal states for a qubit can be explained within such a local realistic theory

STEERING BETWEEN 2 ENSEMBLES OF ORTHOGONAL STATES
The subtlety of deficiency
STEERING BETWEEN 3 ENSEMBLES OF ORTHOGONAL STATES
OUTLOOK
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.