Abstract

This chapter tells the story of how in economists’ struggle to develop a model that captures the essential aspects of the economy, the way in which policy is framed to the general public got screwed up. What do we mean by screwed up? We mean the way the general public is led to believe that when economists support a certain policy, that support is based on their scientific knowledge and theory. This becomes a problem since economists often come to diametrically opposing policy views; some support market fundamentalism and others support government intervention. If their arguments come directly from the same scientific theory, both can’t be right. The answer to this puzzle is that economists’ policy views don’t come from scientific theory but from different interpretations and assumptions of the same scientific theory.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call