Abstract

<p id=C2>Emotion is considered to be an important factor affecting aggressive behavior. According to emotion regulation theory, distressed people hope to improve their moods, and the motivation to use aggression to improve mood will increase aggressive behavior. In other words, the expectation of emotions is an important factor in the generation of aggressive behavior. Previous theories and studies mostly focused on the role of negative emotions such as anger in aggressive behavior. Recently, some researchers believe that positive affect plays an equally important role in aggression. Also, negative and positive affect are orthogonal, they should be studied separately. In addition, according to the purpose of aggression, it is often divided into premeditated/ proactive aggression and impulsive/reactive aggression, the mechanism between the two subtypes may exist differences. Finally, most of the previous studies used college students as participants, and the external validity is limited. The present study based on emotion regulation theory, selected violent offenders as participants to explore the role of negative/positive affect in proactive and reactive aggression with 2 studies. <break/>In study 1, we recruited 88 violent offenders for a scenario-based experiment. Participants were randomly divided into a reactive aggression group (<italic>n</italic> = 46) and a proactive aggression group (<italic>n</italic> = 42) in the adapted reaction time competition paradigm (Taylor Aggression Paradigm). Participants finished the first stage to manipulate types of aggression. Participants were told to compete with another participant (a fake participant) in racing the speed of reactions. In the reactive aggression group, participants lost the game and received negative feedback from their rivals; in the proactive aggression group, participants won the game and received positive feedback from their rivals. Then, they completed the Positive Affect Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) and the questionnaire of emotion regulation motive. Finally, they finished the second stage in which they could send noises to their rivals, which can be considered as an aggressive indicator. Model 4 of Process in SPSS 23.0 was used to test the mediating role of emotion regulation motive between negative/positive affect and aggression. Participants finished PANAS after the second stage for study 2. Repeated measures ANOVA and regression analysis were used to test the change of emotion before and after aggression. <break/>Study 1 showed that the motivation to improve mood played a mediating role between negative emotion and proactive/reactive aggression, but the effect was not significant for positive emotion. Study 2 showed that positive emotions would increase after proactive and reactive aggression; reactive aggression could reduce negative emotions, while proactive aggression could increase negative emotions. <break/>The following conclusions can be obtained from the two experiments: (1) In a negative emotional state, violent offenders hope to improve their mood by conducting aggressive behavior. (2) Proactive and reactive aggression can increase the positive emotions of violent offenders, indicating that aggression can produce pleasure. (3) Reactive aggression can reduce negative emotions; proactive aggression can increase the negative emotions of violent criminals. The present study illustrates the relationship between emotion, especially positive emotion, and aggressive behavior in violent offenders. Aggression can produce pleasure, but it may also increase negative emotions, which in turn increases aggressive behavior, forming a feedback loop, which reflects the non-adaptive of aggressive behavior from the perspective of emotion. In practice, especially in prison, we should help individuals to learn a reasonable way to regulate their emotions, such as mindfulness.

Highlights

  • the expectation of emotions is an important factor in the generation of aggressive behavior

  • Previous theories and studies mostly focused on the role of negative emotions

  • some researchers believe that positive affect plays an

Read more

Summary

Introduction

解释反应性攻击。但针对不同的攻击类型, 其机制 可能有所不同, 以往的研究没有很好地厘清这种差 异。首先, 一般认为, 负性情绪下个体更多产生的 是反应性/冲动性攻击(Krizan & Johar, 2015)。但在 正常人和暴力犯中, 负性情绪与反应性/冲动性攻 击和主动性/预谋性攻击均存在正相关(Raine et al, 2010; 刘宇平 等, 2021)。第二, 一些研究表明, 攻 击后产生的正性情绪可能更多体现在反应性/冲动 性攻击中(Gollwitzer et al, 2011; Eadeh et al, 2017), 近年来的神经生物学研究也支持这一观点:反应性 攻击比主动性攻击更能引发腹侧纹状体等奖赏系 统的激活(Chester & Dewall, 2016)。但是, 个体为了 获得愉悦而选择的攻击, 是具有一定目的性的, 更符合主动性 / 预谋性攻击的定义 (Stanford et al, 2003)。同时, 最新的研究表明, 施虐与攻击行为的 相关不会受到攻击类型的调节(Chester et al, 2019), 换言之, 为了获取快感, 个体既会实施反应性/冲 动性攻击, 也会选择主动性/预谋性攻击。最后, 有 关攻击前后负性情绪变化的研究大多关注的是反 应性/冲动性攻击(Carlsmith et al, 2008; Eadeh et al, 2017), 或没有对攻击类型做很好的区分(Chester & DeWall, 2017)。这在一定程度上导致了攻击对负性 情绪影响的争议。仅在 Chester 和 DeWall (2017)一 文的两项子研究中, 便前后出现了三种混合的结 果:社会排斥组个体实施攻击后负性情绪降低, 无 排斥组实施攻击后负性情绪无显著变化, 而回归分 析显示, 在控制了攻击前的负性情绪后, 攻击大小 能正向预测攻击后的负性情绪。值得注意的是, 在 回归分析中, Chester 和 Dewall (2017)并没有考察社 会排斥的调节作用。 1.5 本研究

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call