Abstract

The surveillance of surgical wound infection (SWI) may be undertaken for a number of purposes which include evaluating changes in practice, studying the epidemiology of SWI and for assessing the quality of health care. Purchasers require this information from providers as an indicator of the quality of care. Surveillance of SWI can also have a role in audit, by setting standards and comparing observed practice with agreed standards. The level of SWI can be the standard, and the collection, analysis and interpretation of data (undertaken during surveillance) could be the means for measuring the standard. In a surveillance programme, data collection is often the most time consuming and difficult element and requires considerable planning. Initially, the data to be collected should be defined. This will be influenced by the purposes of surveillance, the ways the events (SWI) are defined, the data required to produce meaningful analyses and criteria used for identifying the patient. After the data has been defined, data collection methods should be chosen. The importance of assessing the accuracy and limitations of data collection methods in local settings is stressed. Only then is it possible to be sure that the data is a reliable basis on which to base decisions which promote the quality of health care.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.