How do job insecurity profiles correspond to employee experiences of work-home interference, self-rated health, and psychological well-being?

Abstract

ObjectivesTraditional variable‐oriented research has shown that employee perceptions of job insecurity (JI) are associated with negative consequences, including more work‐home interference, poorer health, and impaired well‐being. Besides the negative consequences of high JI, particular combinations of JI perceptions may also be associated with different consequences. Taking a person‐oriented approach, this study aimed to investigate (1) whether it is possible to distinguish different combinations of JI perceptions among working women and men and (2) whether such JI profiles involve different experiences of work‐home interference, health, and well‐being.MethodsSelf‐reports in questionnaires of JI, including both quantitative and qualitative threats of perceived job loss, work‐home interference (WHI), health, and psychological well‐being came from 1169 white‐collar workers (52.4% women) in Sweden. Latent profile analysis was performed to identify JI profiles. Subsequent analyses included comparing profiles with respect to WHI, health, and well‐being.ResultsFour distinct JI profiles were identified: (1) Secure; quality‐concerned, (2) Insecure: employment‐concerned, (3) Insecure, and (4) Secure. Comparisons of cluster profiles showed significant differences in work‐home interference (family‐work conflict), self‐rated health, and psychological well‐being.ConclusionsFindings suggest that the Insecure profile may be most vulnerable to adverse consequences of perceived JI. Taken together, different JI profiles may be associated with differential experiences of work‐home interference, health, and psychological well‐being among working women and men.