How do general practitioners test and treat gonococcal infections in the Australian Capital Territory? Implications for disease surveillance and control.

Abstract

The incidence of Neisseria gonorrhoeae (gonorrhoea) and Treponema pallidum (syphilis) infections in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) has increased since 2014 in people reporting heterosexual exposure. This population is more likely to present to general practice rather than to specialised sexual health clinics, with potential implications for disease surveillance and control. This study aimed to explore: conformity of self-reported clinical practice with sexually transmitted infection guidelines in general practice; gaps in sexual health knowledge and skills; and areas for improved support from ACT Health Communicable Disease Control. A cross-sectional survey of general practitioners (GPs) and nurse practitioners (NPs) practicing in the ACT was conducted in December 2020, using a 17-item questionnaire and semi-structured interviews. Twenty-three GPs and one NP returned completed surveys (response rate 5.3%); four GPs and one NP participated in interviews. In its complex setting of competing demands, GP practice may not always meet national guidelines. In response to clinical vignettes, although all GPs ordered investigations for gonorrhoea, only 25% of these met the gold-standard by including endocervical or vaginal swabs. With respect to assessing antimicrobial sensitivities to guide treatment, only 58% correctly reported following up a positive gonococcal polymerase chain reaction test with a culture. Around two-thirds of respondents (62.5%) identified the appropriate antibiotic therapy and 75% correctly identified the responsibility of the diagnosing clinician to discuss contact tracing with the patient. Suggestions for increased support focussed on education, communication efficiency, and providing a 'safety net' for follow up.