Abstract

<em><span>The need to incorporate cultural aspects into business practice is long-standing. The cultural environment in Ukraine and Italy was reshaped, especially during the Covid-19 pandemic. Social networks reflected such transformation both at the personal level and in the business activities of national companies on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and other media. Facebook pages were analyzed as the most popular social platform in Ukraine and Italy to reveal these changes. Content analysis of countries' leaders in retail, e-commerce, and service was carried out, namely </span><span>EVA, Rozetka, and Nova Noshta for Ukraine; and Conad, Bottega Verde, and Italo Treno for Italy. T</span><span>wo-phase desk research was conducted with ten research questions for each cultural dimension encoded in a binary system. The research has shown that Ukrainian business still manifests collaborative problem solving, compliance with social standards, and the value of human life. It demonstrates a low level of power distance and uncertainty avoidance. Ukraine is gradually changing its paradigm of thinking to a more hedonic and individualistic similar to Western Europe. In contrast, Italy shows less respect for power in all its manifestations and a greater willingness to take risks than before. The country has become less goal-oriented, restrained, and masculine but more collectivistic.</span></em>

Highlights

  • In the late 1970s, the need to consider cultural peculiarities in business practice became evident

  • Content analysis of companies' Facebook pages was conducted based on the idea of Lo et al (2017) of using a "yes-no" binary approach

  • We estimated whether textual and non-textual content on companies' Facebook pages gravitated more towards one extreme of Hofstede's rating scale over the other

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In the late 1970s, the need to consider cultural peculiarities in business practice became evident. Scientists began to look at company management through a cross-cultural lens. Hofstede, 1980) has been used to describe cultural differences. Six main dimensions were contemplated as criteria to represent national cultures, namely: Individualism vs Collectivism, High vs Low Power Distance, High vs Low Uncertainty Avoidance, Masculinity vs Femininity, Long-Term vs Short-Term Orientation, and Indulgence vs Restraint Hofstede & Bond, 1988; Geert Hofstede et al, 2010; Minkov, 2007) 2001; G. Hofstede & Bond, 1988; Geert Hofstede et al, 2010; Minkov, 2007)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call