Year-end Sale % OFF 
Abstract
AbstractPurpose:In this study, a research was conducted to compare  link corporate governance, credit risk, and performance on conventional banking and islamic banking in Indonesia.Methodology:This research used quantitative method with Generalized Structured Component Analysis (GSCA) for testing and analzing. In this study using conventional and sharia banking data in Indonesia for the period 2012-2016 which are listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange and the Indonesian Financial Services Authorit.FindingThe result of  research showed that on the conventional banking, profitability is influenced by the link together of corporate governance, liquidity and credit risk, while on the islamic banking, profitability is influenced by the link together  of liquidity and credit risk.Practical Implication:First, the existence and number of the Board of Commissioners and Audit Committee in conventional banking are able to support the achievement of performance. This should be maintained and improved.Second, supervision is needed to manage distributing of sharia financing. Islamic banking has two indicators that play a role in the formation of credit risk which have the potential to reduce liquidity and profitability.Third, it is necessary to trade-off for the management of islamic banking in managing their liquidity because the increase in liquidity has the potential to reduce profitability.Novelty:The first study comparing the linkage between corporate governance, credit risk and performance in conventional and islamic banking in Indonesia using GSCA. Keywords: corporate governance, credit risk, performance
Highlights
Discussion about corporate governance cannot be separated from the agency theory, where there is an agency problem between managers and principals
Agency problems that occur in banks can be broader, between managers and principals, and with depositors, debtors and regulators, even regulators have a strong influence on corporate governance in banking (Ciancanelli & Reyes-Gonzalez, 2005; Macey & O’Hara, 2003; Marcinkowska, 2012)
IMPACT CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ON PROFITABILITY Based on above results, the research showed that corporate governance had no significant effect toward profitability in islamic banking and wasn’t relevant to previous research by Nurtrontong et al, (2018) in conventional banking
Summary
Discussion about corporate governance cannot be separated from the agency theory, where there is an agency problem between managers and principals. Agency problems that occur in banks can be broader, between managers and principals, and with depositors, debtors and regulators, even regulators have a strong influence on corporate governance in banking (Ciancanelli & Reyes-Gonzalez, 2005; Macey & O’Hara, 2003; Marcinkowska, 2012). With regulations regarding good corporate governance and risk management, regulator hope can assist Islamic banking in achieving performance while still considering the risk limits and interests of all stake holders as well as conventional banking. This has attracted the interest of researchers to examine more deeply on islamic banking and compare it with conventional banking to continue previous research by Nurtrontong et al, (2018) on conventional banking. The comparison between islamic and conventional banking with the collaboration of the three components using GSCA is a novelty in this study
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: The International Journal of Accounting and Business Society
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
