Abstract

As argued in Kamio's (1990, 1997) works on the theory of territory of information and other studies, there are differences in how evidentials are used in Japanese and English. Due to such differences, English-speaking learners have been reported to face difficulties when marking their epistemic stance in Japanese (Kamada, 1990). This study systematically investigates how English-speaking learners of Japanese use hearsay evidentials in Japanese and English, and it empirically examines whether there is a transfer effect from the learners’ first language to the target language. Data were elicited through production questionnaires in which the learners were instructed to verbally convey hearsay information to specified addressees. Quantitative analysis of the data showed that the learners used significantly less overt hearsay evidentials in both languages, as compared to the Japanese speakers’ production in Japanese. Furthermore, quantitative and qualitative analyses identified patterns which suggest possible effects of transfer from English to Japanese. Additionally, close examination of the learners’ production according to evidential types and in relation to the situational variables controlled in this study revealed instances in which the learners were attempting to approximate the Japanese speakers’ use. Suggestions for future research and for a pedagogical approach to teaching the use of hearsay evidentials are also provided.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.