How Can We Understand and Describe “Non‐Narrative” Narratives? A Qualitative Study of Workers with Recurring Sick Leave

Abstract

AbstractThis study explored methodologies enabling us to hear the “non‐narrative” voices of participants in narrative research. Individual semi‐structured interviews were conducted with seven Japanese workers with recurring sick leave, and the data were analyzed using thematic analysis (TA) and dialogical narrative analysis (DNA). In narrators' apparently chaotic and fragmented statements, TA identified three divided self‐images that remained disconnected: image of present self with a sense of setbacks, image of past self, and image of ideal self. As the last two self‐images ceaselessly negate the first, these workers had lost a sense of autonomy and self‐confidence. On the other hand, DNA described their desperate endeavors to organize their sick leave experiences by appealing to the typology of the illness narrative; however, this effort remained a failure. Through two qualitative analyses that suspended the premise that each narrative enables the narrator's construction of self, we were able to understand the real status of participants who could not narrate their experiences. The ethical obligation of researchers to respect the “unfinalizability” of narrative and remain open to continuous dialogue is discussed.