Abstract

BackgroundEarlier studies indicate a correlation between disability claims experience and return to work outcomes. Thus, the insurer’s role and actions may affect the self-rated health of the disabled worker and the outcomes of occupational rehabilitation. This study diversifies the existing empirical evidence on the role of the insurer in the rehabilitation process and reveals the critical actions that best promote success.Materials and methodsExplorative factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), followed by binary regression, were used to analyse survey data of disabled workers (n = 661) who had undergone an occupational rehabilitation within an earnings-related pension insurance system in Finland.ResultsThe claimant’s perceptions of the insurer’s (1) high-quality informing and guidance, (2) customer orientation, (3) smooth process flow and (4) positive service attitude had substantial and statistically significant effects on the success of occupational rehabilitation after adjusting for all likely confounding variables.ConclusionsThe insurer’s actions are significant predictors of the outcome of occupational rehabilitation. The insurer can promote the health of rehabilitees most effectively by ensuring a smooth process flow and adopting a customer-oriented approach.

Highlights

  • Earlier studies indicate a correlation between disability claims experience and return to work outcomes

  • The insurer can promote the health of rehabilitees most effectively by ensuring a smooth process flow and adopting a customer-oriented approach

  • Many disability insurance systems only cover injuries or illnesses if they are due to a specific cause, including workers’ compensation, automobile insurance and crime victim’s insurance

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Earlier studies indicate a correlation between disability claims experience and return to work outcomes. While there are huge disparities between and within nations when it comes to public disability insurance systems, they still have common features regarding the compensation process and the role of the administrative body (whether it is a public social insurance agency or private insurance company). This organisation is usually responsible for the compensations and it interacts with all the stakeholders involved in the rehabilitation and return to work process [1,2,3]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.