How bias shapes the news

Abstract

This article addresses bias in the American press and shows how the inevitability of reporting from a point of view challenges the possibility of a newspaper of record on the Middle East. Examining 30 days of coverage of the Intifada, it both shows that coverage of events varied across three mainstream US newspapers – The New York Times, The Washington Post and Chicago Tribune – and demonstrates that in the case of the newspaper most often called a newspaper of record – The New York Times – coverage varied in distinct ways from other mainstream newspapers. The article thus considers how the Times' reputation and influence converge with its record in creating a broader impression about the perspective of the US press on the Middle East.