Abstract

Author SummaryWhen making a decision, we gather evidence for the different options and ultimately choose on the basis of the accumulated evidence. A fundamental question is whether and how conscious awareness of the evidence changes this decision-making process. Here, we examined the influence of sensory awareness on decision-making using behavioral studies and magneto-encephalographic recordings in human participants. In our task, participants had to indicate the prevailing direction of five arrows presented on a screen that each pointed either left or right, and in different trials these arrows were either easy to see (high visibility) or difficult to see (low visibility). Behavioral and neural recordings show that evidence accumulation changed from a linear to a non-linear integration strategy with increasing stimulus visibility. In particular, the impact of later evidence was reduced when more evidence had been accrued, but only for highly visible information. By contrast, barely perceptible arrows contributed equally to a decision because participants needed to continue to accumulate evidence in order to make an accurate decision. These results suggest that consciousness may play a role in decision-making by biasing the accumulation of new evidence.

Highlights

  • Many decisions can be formalized as a process of accumulation of evidence over time, favoring one alternative over another [1,2]

  • We examined the influence of sensory awareness on decision-making using behavioral studies and magneto-encephalographic recordings in human participants

  • Participants had to indicate the prevailing direction of five arrows presented on a screen that each pointed either left or right, and in different trials these arrows were either easy to see or difficult to see

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Many decisions can be formalized as a process of accumulation of evidence over time, favoring one alternative over another [1,2]. We investigate whether accumulation of evidence is affected by the level of awareness of the information. The amount of priming and subliminal processing increases linearly with prime processing [13,14], suggesting that some stages of evidence accumulation can proceed without awareness. Relatively long-term effects of subliminal priming have sometimes been observed [15,16,17,18], suggesting that accumulation of unconscious information is possible. It is an open question whether and how awareness modulates the way evidence is accumulated during decision-making

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call