Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We sought to study the process by which decisions to commit individuals to long-term nutritional support via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) are made. METHODS: A semistructured questionnaire was administered to surrogates and patients in 73 cases of persons undergoing PEG. RESULTS: Such decisions are often made with inadequate information regarding the PEG and its possible impact on the future clinical course, sometimes with an overly optimistic view of the prognosis. Several factors may influence this process. In cases in which the underlying illness was severe, 30% of surrogate decisionmakers expressed some uncertainty that a right decision was made. CONCLUSIONS: The decision to commit patients to long-term nutritional support via PEG is often difficult and the implications of such a commitment may have major implications for patients and their families. Strategies to optimize this decisionmaking process are recommended.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
