Abstract
The Libet experiments investigated arbitrary decisions, though their results were long assumed to generalize to deliberate ones too. This has launched a debate, which is ongoing, regarding whether there are differences in the neural mechanisms underlying arbitrary and deliberate decisions. The debate thus directly relates to the extent to which the Libet results can be generalized beyond arbitrary decisions. Several studies provide conflicting support for the generalizability of the readiness potential (RP) from arbitrary to deliberate decisions. Some found similarities between the neural correlates of actions following arbitrary and deliberate decisions; others found differences. This chapter describes those studies and discusses how to potentially reconcile these conflicting results.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
